Some features of Jess's language suggest she is still in the early stages of the post telegraphic stages, and suggest she is yet to learn how to communicate fully, through words, what she wants to communicate to her Mother. For example from line 2 I can see that she does not yet know how to use negation correctly, because she misses out the "do" within the sentence, which shows she does not know that there is another verb required to make the sentence make full sense. However the child does understand that negation is used to convey the opposite to an action, and this is understood by her Mother, which shows that she can communicate her point across, just not in the correct fashion. She knows that the word "not" or a substitute for this is vital in telling the other person that she is in opposition to this idea or feels in the opposite way. i feel that the child is struggling to get this sentence grammatically correct because she has not yet come to terms with verbs other than material verbs such as jump or play, therefore finds the concept of 'do' hard to classify.
She can structure simple sentences, by using a personal pronoun and a verb, which shows that she is in the post telegraphic stage, however she is in the early stages because her sentences are very basic and yet to be fully grammatically correct. She does not know how to use determiners such as "the" or "this" and leaves them out when stating a preposition "it go in middle". This shows that the child does not make complete sense in her sentences and therefore that she is not fully developed in her speech. As the child grows older it may begin to realise where words go because of reading them or hearing them. In a sense this backs up B.F Skinner's behaviourist thoery that children acquire language through imitation and reptition. As Jess grows older she may hear people use the word 'the' before a preposition or noun and realise that this is the way things should be said in order to be grammatically correct.
On line 16 I can see that Jess is beginning to pick up some regional dialect, I can see this from the way that she says 'them' like "em". This could be due to the place that she grew up in and the way that her parents speak to her. This further backs up the theory of language acquisition through imitation, because the child has heard her mother or father saying these words and now believes that this is the correct way to say them, because she has obviously never heard any different. This is positive as it shows that she is learning language.
On line 16 I can see that Jess is beginning to pick up some regional dialect, I can see this from the way that she says 'them' like "em". This could be due to the place that she grew up in and the way that her parents speak to her. This further backs up the theory of language acquisition through imitation, because the child has heard her mother or father saying these words and now believes that this is the correct way to say them, because she has obviously never heard any different. This is positive as it shows that she is learning language.